Today's Science Times...
actually read it cover to cover.
Let me know if you agree that this interview with a departing congressman is not, like, seriously and unexpectedly sad and moving.
And also, for all those educators and sex-advocates (just kidding on the latter [not]!) who are concerned with these abstinence-only pledges and chastity rings and whatnot, this somewhat confusing survey result just goes to show that if anything, teens need an open, frank diaolgue about sex and its consequences, not some mystical born again hocus-pocus bullcrap. Like the pamphlet entitled "God Created Sex" which I found resting on a students' desk after class one day. I wasn't sure whether to laugh or cry.
Let me know if you agree that this interview with a departing congressman is not, like, seriously and unexpectedly sad and moving.
And also, for all those educators and sex-advocates (just kidding on the latter [not]!) who are concerned with these abstinence-only pledges and chastity rings and whatnot, this somewhat confusing survey result just goes to show that if anything, teens need an open, frank diaolgue about sex and its consequences, not some mystical born again hocus-pocus bullcrap. Like the pamphlet entitled "God Created Sex" which I found resting on a students' desk after class one day. I wasn't sure whether to laugh or cry.
Labels: New York Times on Education
1 Comments:
I should know better, but somehow it seems that science should be separate and apart from the usual Washington stuff.
The truth is otherwise, and ugly.
Post a Comment
<< Home